9/13/2014 3:30 PM
|Could you please check out Denee's thread right beneath this one? The one with no subject.
I agree with her.
9/14/2014 11:32 AM
|I voted no to the 2 minute break on the 'yes' or 'no' thread but I think a 1 minute break would be okay.|
9/14/2014 6:30 PM
|I thought the two minutes would be great, but it wasn't. 30 seconds would be all right, but if the less the better, than we're probably better off going right into the next game. From the looks of things, most people prefer it that way.|
9/14/2014 7:28 PM
|I voted "yes" on the other thread, since having a break is a good idea, although in practice 2 minutes is rather long, and I prefer a too-long break to no break.
While offering a larger set of choices is more complicated than just "2 minutes or nothing - take it or leave it", I would have preferred a multiple choice version of the vote:
A) no break
B) 30 seconds
C) 60 seconds
D) 90 seconds
E) 120 seconds
In which case I would have voted for C.
9/14/2014 9:15 PM
|Or, as I think someone may have more or less suggested elsewhere, offer a choice of intervals (including none) during game setup. To my mind, that would be ideal, although obviously more work.|
9/15/2014 12:24 AM
|Well, must say I like 2 minutes, but failing that, one minute would be great.|
9/20/2014 4:27 AM
|It's all over the place. After one game it will be 30 seconds and after the next game it will be 120 seconds. Are we in test mode?|